The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.viveksanghi.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Vivek Sanghi advocate of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement, or inducement by Vivek Sanghi Advocate or his associates.
The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice.
Vivek Sanghi Advocate shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Vivek Sanghi Advocate.
Vivek Sanghi - Lawyer | Advocate | Attorney
Civil Litigation & Property Law | Real Estate & Property Title Due Diligence | Property Title Disputes, Contract Drafting & Enforcement | Commercial Contracts
AI is usable in legal practice — the errors are real but survivable. Here is the discipline that identifies and handles them: a verification workflow, correct tool setup, the right subscriptions, and honest disclosure — anchored in Pooja Ramesh Singh and Cork v. Smith.
Cognitive bias distorts legal research, title work, drafting and argument long before a case reaches court. A practitioner’s guide, with Indian case law.
A forged 1973 sale deed cost 130 Telangana buyers their plots. The property title-verification mistakes that show up most often — and the exact check that catches each one.
A practical, plain-language guide for junior advocates and civil litigators on choosing the correct relief — injunction, declaration, possession, cancellation or rectification — before drafting a plaint, built around Anathula Sudhakar and the leading Supreme Court authorities.
The judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Amazon vs Future Retail Limited and Others provides support to emergency arbitration provisions contained in the institutional rules of various arbitration institutions in India and around the world. Parties can be expected to resort to institutional arbitration to avail benefits of emergency arbitration without worrying much about the enforcement.
The said judgment encourages contracting parties to choose the seat of arbitration as India.
The said judgment leaves much to be desired for those who want to choose a seat of arbitration other that India, and the legal fraternity shall await clarity regarding enforcement (in India) of foreign seated emergency awards.